Vai al contenuto
Home » Ice-hockey » Ice Hockey » Leksands vs Rogle

Leksands vs Rogle

Expert Analysis: Leksands vs Rogle – Ice-Hockey Betting Insights

The upcoming ice-hockey match between Leksands and Rogle on November 1, 2025, promises to be an exciting encounter. Both teams have shown commendable performance throughout the season, making this match a focal point for betting enthusiasts. This analysis delves into various betting predictions based on historical data and current team dynamics.

Leksands

WLWLL
-

Rogle

LWWWW
Date: 2025-11-01
Time: 14:15
(FT)
Venue: Not Available Yet
Score: 2-0

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Under 5.5 Goals73.10%(2-0) 1.80
Over 4.5 Goals72.20%(2-0)
Under 1.5 Goals in 1P58.10%(2-0)
Highest Scoring Period2.50%(2-0)

Betting Predictions

Under 5.5 Goals (74.60)

The prediction for under 5.5 goals suggests a relatively low-scoring game. Both Leksands and Rogle have displayed strong defensive strategies in recent matches, which could lead to fewer goals being scored. The odds of 74.60 indicate a moderate likelihood of this outcome, making it a potentially lucrative bet for those expecting a tightly contested match.

Over 4.5 Goals (68.40)

In contrast, the over 4.5 goals prediction is based on the offensive capabilities of both teams. With key players returning from injuries and recent form showing an increase in goal-scoring, the odds of 68.40 reflect a reasonable expectation for a higher-scoring game. Bettors favoring this option should consider recent match trends and player lineups.

Under 1.5 Goals in 1P (54.90)

The first period often sets the tone for the rest of the game, and the under 1.5 goals prediction for the first period carries odds of 54.90. This suggests that both teams might adopt a cautious approach initially, focusing on defense before ramping up their offensive efforts in subsequent periods.

Highest Scoring Period (1.20)

The highest scoring period prediction with odds of 1.20 indicates a strong likelihood that one of the periods will see significantly more goals than others. Analyzing past performances, it is often observed that either the second or third period tends to be more dynamic, as teams adjust their strategies and exploit weaknesses identified in earlier periods.